Which governmental practice does racial profiling contradict?

Racial profiling fundamentally contradicts the practice of upholding individual rights and freedoms, which is a cornerstone of democratic societies. This practice involves targeting individuals for law enforcement activities based on their race, ethnicity, or other inherent characteristics rather than on their actions or specific evidence of wrongdoing. By doing so, it violates principles of equality and justice by treating certain groups of people as inherently more suspicious or dangerous due to their racial or ethnic background.

In contrast, other options such as conducting thorough background checks, implementing community-building strategies, and conducting risk assessments based on data typically involve assessments based on objective criteria rather than profiling based on race. Upholding individual rights and freedoms requires treating all individuals with fairness and without discrimination, thereby making it clear that racial profiling undermines this fundamental governmental practice.